Tuesday, March 19

From The Final Call Newspaper

White anger, White insecurity and global White terror

By Brian E. Muhammad and Tariqah Shakir-Muhammad



Brenton Tarrant


Murderous rage in New Zealand, which left 50 people killed in attacks on two mosques in Christchurch, is part of global, growing and deadly White deadly resentment, said analysts, activists and scholars interviewed by The Final Call

“It is very disconcerting, and we should see it as the tip of the iceberg,” said Dr. Wesley Muhammad, a Nation of Islam student minister who holds a Ph.D. in Islamic Studies.



The world largely awakened March 15 to news of one of the bloodiest terror attacks in recent times. A White gunman converged on the mosques targeting everyone in sight during traditional Friday congregational prayer services. An estimated 500 Muslims were attending the Al-Noor Mosque with others at the smaller Linwood Mosque, a short distance away.

Police confirmed three people were arrested and multiple car bombs were found after the mosque shootings. Brenton Tarrant, the alleged shooter who livestreamed the deadly carnage, was charged with murder the day after the killings. “There were a number of IEDs (improvised explosive devices) attached to vehicles that we also stopped. They’ve been made safe by Defense Force but that does go to the seriousness of the situation,” Christchurch police commissioner Mike Bush said. Four people were initially captured by local police and authorities locked down mosques where the attacks took place and much of the city.


NYPD increasing security at Mosques and places of worship in light of the New Zealand attacks, March 15. Photos: MGN Online


“There’s been some absolute acts of bravery ... but let’s not presume that the danger is gone. We are not aware of other people, but we cannot assume there are not others at large,” cautioned the commissioner.

“The pool of sentiment from which he (Mr. Tarrant) came … globally it’s the angry White man, because globally their population is in reverse,” said Dr. Muhammad.
Dr. Wesley Muhammad said White demographic numbers and low birth rates are major factors in the global wave of White nationalism. In the United Kingdom, France and other European nations, Whites are wrestling with increasing numbers of migrants from Africa and darker nations. But, they are arriving amid a time of White population decline and growing economic distress. 

“They (Whites) see themselves losing that great White, Anglo-Saxon power and privilege that they have enjoyed for so long coming to an end,” said human rights activist Lee Jasper, who is based in London, in a previous Final Call interview. Europeans see themselves becoming a minority, but resettled refugees fill needed workforce positions Whites cannot fill because of their declining numbers.

Blacks and ethnic minorities are currently 14 percent of the population across England and Wales, according to a study by Policy Exchange, a UK-based think tank. While Whites are the majority, the Black and ethnic minority population has doubled in the past decade, accounting for 80 percent of population growth. The White population remained stagnant.

Census Bureau numbers say if White birth and death rates don’t change by the mid-2040s, Whites will be a minority population in the United States.

Dr. Wesley Muhammad expects White anger to intensify after the New Zealand tragedy.

The Daily Mail, a UK-based newspaper, reported suspected Christchurch terrorist Tarrant, 28, vowed to kill Muslims a day before the attack. The native of Australia was praised after the heinous act by followers on social media. The Daily Mail said an anonymous user, believed to be Mr. Tarrant, posted on the rightwing blog site 8Chan March 14: “I will carry out an attack against the invaders and will even live stream the attack via Facebook.”

“When they can livestream murder of worshippers at prayer you know depravity has sunk to lowest pits,” commented Moazzam Begg, outreach director for IIICAGE, a London-based advocacy organization for communities impacted by the War on Terror. “This hatred has been stoked by politicians and media. They must be accounted alongside killers,” Mr. Begg said in a Facebook video message responding to the attacks.

The Council on American-Islamic Relations, a U.S.-based Muslim civil rights and advocacy group, condemned the attacks. CAIR expressed concern that the alleged shooter called himself a supporter of President Donald Trump, who he sees “as a symbol of renewed White identity and common purpose.”

CAIR has reported an unprecedented spike in bigotry targeting American Muslims, immigrants and members of other minority groups since the election of Mr. Trump as president. CAIR has repeatedly expressed concern about Islamophobic, White supremacist and racist Trump administration policies and appointments.

New Zealand Prime Minister Jacinda Ardern lamented to the media that she never expected such a thing to happen in New Zealand. However, some observers of New Zealand history disagreed. They expressed surprise a tragedy didn’t occur sooner. “Racism is absolutely the norm in New Zealand,” said Dr. Randy Lancaster Short, a lay leader of the African Orthodox Church. “It’s a serious problem and it’s focused on their version of ‘niggers.’ ”

New Zealand like Australia, where the accused shooter is from, has a brutal colonial past that lingers on in deep social disparities along racial lines today, he said. As in other neocolonial states, it is New Zealand’s indigenous Black Maori population that suffers the biggest burden of inequality.

Race-driven killings have become more prevalent in the United States, Canada and Europe where racist xenophobia has taken root among Caucasians against immigrants, particularly migrants from Africa and the Middle East.




In the U.S., mosques have been desecrated and Dylan Roof, a White nationalist and domestic terrorist, slaughtered nine members of Mother Emanuel AME Church in Charleston, S.C., during a 2015 bible study. Mr. Roof claimed unequivocal allegiance to White nationalism and was hoping the act would inspire a race war.





In Canada, Alexandre Bissonnette, 28, opened fire on worshippers during evening prayers at the Islamic Cultural Centre of Quebec City in January 2017. Six people died and 19 others were wounded in the attack. Reports said those who knew him said he held far-right, White nationalist, anti-refugee and anti-Muslim views.

Though Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and Premier Philippe Couillard called the shooting a terrorist attack, Mr. Bissonnette was not charged under the terrorism provision of Canadian law. He was found guilty and sentenced to life in prison, without the possibility of parole for 40 years.

In July 2011, White Supremacist and anti-Muslim extremist Anders Breivik carried out a murderous rampage in Norway. Mr. Breivik parked a van outside the Parliament building in Oslo and lit a bomb that killed eight people. He then shot 69 people to death, mostly teenagers at a youth camp on the island of Utoya. He carried out the shooting over the course of an hour and a half before police arrived. He also distributed racist material online and a manifesto of his views to 1,000 email addresses. He was convicted of terrorism and murder and sentenced to 21 years in prison.

Mr. Tarrant paid homage to these and other race warriors as his heroes and fellow travelers. He also posted a manifesto online where he argued Whites were under attack and he was striking a blow for the salvation of Caucasian people.

“The deeper end and more disturbing part of this is that it’s an indicator that the final conflict is really about to occur,” said Dr. Ava Muhammad, national spokesperson for the Honorable Minister Louis Farrakhan. The Christchurch attack is a reminder of an ever-present White supremacist mentality, she warned.


Alexandre Bissonnette


“Minister Farrakhan’s call for Black people in America to seek refuge in a separate state or territory of our own has gone beyond a watch to a warning and by that I mean we have to create our own safe haven,” Dr. Ava Muhammad continued. “Whatever happens in New Zealand, which is predominantly Caucasian owned and operated, is a reflection of the tentacles of the United States and, of course, its doctrines of White supremacy. Unfortunately, we can expect more and more of these to happen.”

Eyewitness Mohammad Jama from Masjid Al-Noor Mosque in Christchurch described in horrific detail the afternoon of the attack. “We were into 10 minutes of our prayers and then we heard gunshots outside, but kept on praying,” he told reporters for Radio New Zealand. “Next minute, it was inside. He was a light-colored skin guy and he started firing and we all went for cover. A couple of guys from inside probably ran outside and they all came out in blood. When we got up we saw people lying around us (who) were shot. They had blood coming out, some from the neck.”

A young Muslim man challenged the armed Mr. Tarrant, who dropped his weapon, fled, and was apprehended by police.





Anders Behring Breivik


Yasmin Ali said the attack left her terrified in what used to be one of the most peaceful places for Muslims. “What terrifies me is that there’s people out there who are enjoying this … that support this, it pushes their cause even more and I am really scared for our future,” she said. “I’m terrified. I don’t know if I’m going to feel safe walking by myself wearing my headscarf and I’ve never felt that way before.”

Imam Amin Nathari, of the Islam in America Movement, called the attack unsurprising given Islamophobia across the globe. “This was more of a manifestation or a consequence of the hate that Trump has produced and that now there’s Islamophobia and the things we see happening in America spreading across the world. Looking at his [President Trump’s] response, his response was deplorable but it’s just representative of his view of immigrants and Muslims of any ethnicity,” said the imam.


New Zealand PM Jacinda Ardern discuss- ing the mosque shootings in Christchurch, New Zealand. Photos: MGN Online


Muslims in immigrant and Black communities should be extra precautions, he added. “We should never think that the enemy sleeps; the enemy never sleeps, he just changes shifts.”

Tuesday, March 12

From The Final Call Newspaper


The targeting of a courageous congresswoman and fighting the false charge of anti-Semitism
By Barrington M. Salmon -Contributing Writer-






WASHINGTON—Since she entered Congress in January, Rep. Ilhan Omar has enjoyed one of the highest profiles in the freshman class of the 116th Congress.

A Somali-American, who happens to be Muslim, she’s attracted attention as much for being one of the first Muslims voted to Congress as for her outspokenness and willingness to shake up the establishment.

Twice in one month, her comments about the power and influence of the American Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and recent tweets and a comment during a town hall meeting created a firestorm and condemnation from congressional politicians on both sides of the aisle.

“I should not be expected to have allegiance/pledge support to a foreign country in order to serve my country in Congress or serve on committee,” Omar tweeted. “I am told every day that I am anti-American if I am not pro-Israel. I find that to be problematic and I am not alone. I just happen to be willing to speak up on it and open myself to attacks.”

She took part in a Feb. 28 town hall at Busboys and Poets in midtown D.C. where her comments, again about Israeli influence on congressional lawmakers, sparked outrage, some real, some feigned from Republicans like House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy, Reps. Louis Gohmert and Steve King, who have made anti-Semitic remarks or shared similarly offensive comments and memes on social media.

In answer to a question, Rep. Omar elaborated on her position.

“… But now that you have two Muslims that are saying ‘here is a group of people that we want to make sure that they have the dignity that you want everyone else to have!’ … We get to be called names, we get to be labeled as hateful. No, we know what hate looks like. We experience it every single day. We have to deal with death threats. I have colleagues who talk about death threats ... .”

Political journalists familiar with the workings of AIPAC said the organization dispatched Democratic leaders to fashion a resolution condemning anti-Semitism, bigotry and hate speech. But things didn’t work out as originally planned.

House Democrats led by members of the Congressional Black Caucus, challenged House Speaker Pelosi and other Democratic leaders for seeking to impose sanctions on Rep. Omar for her alleged anti-Semitic remarks yet Democrats have done nothing in response to President Donald Trump’s steady stream of racist, anti-Muslim comments and his embrace of White nationalists.

Furthermore, the CBC and other representatives said, it was hypocritical and disingenuous for the body to be considering a resolution condemning religious hatred without including a condemnation of anti-Islam bias and rhetoric. This schism led to a vote of the resolution being delayed, expanded and then passing the House on March 7 with the language broadened to include these concerns. The ADL, some Republicans and Democrats howled it was not enough, that there should have a been a resolution about anti-Semitism—and it should have specifically named the congresswoman from Minnesota.

“I think there’s a big rise in anti-Semitism and racism, and that’s a bigger conversation we need to be having. But it starts at 1600 Pennsylvania. It doesn’t start with one member out of 435 members of Congress,” Rep. Cedric L. Richmond (D-La.) reportedly told his colleagues in the closed-door Democratic session.

President Trump has angered Black people since he assumed office with his harsh and demeaning rhetoric towards Blacks. He called Black NFL players sons of bitches for kneeling to protest racism, police brutality, inequality, injustice and the extrajudicial killings of Black men, women and children; he has been explicit in his support of White nationalists, including equivocating after White nationalist protests, the racial attacks and murder of Heather Heyer in Charlottesville; his disrespect to prominent Black women, such as Reps. Maxine Waters and Frederica Wilson, Jemele Hill, April Ryan and Abby Philip and more.


Rep. Omar has received the backing of Reps. Alexandra Ocasio Cortez, Rebecca Tlaib and Sens. Kamala Harris and Bernie Sanders.


Sen. Sanders’ office released a statement earlier calling the initial bill wrong.

“Anti-Semitism is a hateful and dangerous ideology which must be vigorously opposed in the United States and around the world. We must not, however, equate anti-Semitism with legitimate criticism of the right-wing, Netanyahu government in Israel. Rather, we must develop an even-handed Middle East policy which brings Israelis and Palestinians together for a lasting peace,” Sen. Sanders said.

“What I fear is going on in the House now is an effort to target Congresswoman Omar as a way of stifling that debate. That’s wrong,” Sen. Sanders added.

Senator Kamala Harris (D-CA) also issued a statement.

“We all have a responsibility to speak out against anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, homophobia, transphobia, racism, and all forms of hatred and bigotry, especially as we see a spike in hate crimes in America,” Sen. Harris said as reported by the Huffington Post. “But like some of my colleagues in the Congressional Black Caucus, I am concerned that the spotlight being put on Congresswoman Omar may put her at risk.”

Rep. Ocasio Cortez said, in several tweets, that the fiery backlash her colleague is facing illustrates the double standard in Congress’ response to different forms of bigotry.

“One of the things that is hurtful about the extent to which reprimand is sought of Ilhan is that no one seeks this level of reprimand when members make statements about Latinx plus other communities (during the shutdown, a GOP member yelled ‘Go back to Puerto Rico!’ on the floor),” Rep. Ocasio-Cortez said on Twitter.

Rep. Ocasio Cortez said lawmakers have been given a pass for racist, anti-Muslim, anti-LGBTQ comments and misogyny so congressional leaders should be clear about what behavior merits formal condemnation.

“...incidents like these do beg the question: where are the resolutions against homophobic statements? For anti-blackness? For xenophobia? For a member saying he’ll ‘send Obama home to Kenya?’ ” she asked.

The bill passed by a vote of 407-23. Twenty-three Republicans opposed the measure.

Rep. Omar has had the backing of Jewish Voice for Peace and 40 Jewish organizations around the nation. Prominent Jewish Americans like Naomi Klein, The Nation’s Dave Zirin, Israeli historian, author and activist Ilan PappĂ© also signed an open letter stating that Rep. Omar has been “falsely accused of antisemitism” and that there was nothing anti-Semitic about calling out the “noxious” role of the American Israel Public Affairs Committee in American politics.




The letter continues, “the pro-Israel lobby has played an outsized role in producing nearly unanimous congressional support for Israel,” and slammed AIPAC and other lobby groups including the National Rifle Association and the fossil fuel lobby for its “ ‘anti-democratic’ legislative influence on US politics … We thank Ilhan Omar for having the bravery to shake up the congressional taboo against criticizing Israel. As Jews with a long tradition of social justice and anti-racism, AIPAC does not represent us,” and called on other Jews to sign the letter.

Rep. Omar is just the latest critic of the Israeli government who has become the lightning rod of a concentrated barrage of criticism and condemnation from supporters of Israeli’s occupation. The Israeli lobby has effectively used claims of anti-Semitism as a consistent and valuable tool to silence dissent. Supporters have been aggressive in trying to blunt the criticisms of those opposed to the Israeli occupation. According to published reports, 26 state legislatures have passed bills criminalizing the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) movement. BDS organizers have patterned the movement on the one that toppled South Africa’s White minority government and the odious apartheid system. BDS seeks to end Israel’s open defiance of a 2004 International Court of Justice advisory opinion declaring the wall in the West Bank illegal. The U.S. Senate passed the “Combat BDS Act” earlier this year as a way to isolate boycott supporters, despite widespread concerns about the bill violating the First Amendment.

Lawmakers, AIPAC representatives and others express outrage at the very idea that the Israel lobby holds any influence, but Israel has long been referred to as the 51st state, and in the early 1970s, Sen William Fulbright called Congress “Israeli-Occupied territory.”

Until now, Israel has received almost total immunity from criticism in the U.S., as noted in a 1971 op-ed for The New York Times by former diplomat David G. Nes who said Israel enjoyed economic, military, diplomatic and cultural support from the U.S.

Mehdi Hasan, a journalist and writer for The Intercept, wrote in a Feb. 12 article that there has always been a taboo against criticizing AIPAC and Rep. Omar, he added, just destroyed it.

Mr. Hasan cited several cases of AIPAC officials boasting about the raw power that “America’s bipartisan pro-Israel lobby” exercises in Washington, D.C.

He recounted the story of Steven Rosen, then a senior official with AIPAC, sat down for dinner with journalist Jeffrey Goldberg, then of the New Yorker in 2005. “You see this napkin?” Rosen asked Goldberg. “In twenty-four hours, [AIPAC] could have the signatures of seventy senators on this napkin.”

“Go back … to 1992, when then-AIPAC President David Steiner was caught on tape bragging that he had ‘cut a deal’ with the George H.W. Bush White House to provide $3 billion in U.S. aid to Israel. Steiner also claimed to be ‘negotiating’ with the incoming Clinton administration over the appointment of pro-Israel cabinet members. AIPAC, he said, has ‘a dozen people in [the Clinton] campaign, in the headquarters … and they’re all going to get big jobs.’ ”

AIPAC’s clout is undeniable. What Mr. Hasan has clarified is that while AIPAC is not a political action committee and does not provide donations directly to candidates, it does act as a “force multiplier,” in the sense that when the organization signals “its rhetorical support for a candidate is a signal to Jewish PACs and individual donors across the country to back his or her campaign.”

Rep. Omar is also widely acknowledged to have forced much-needed dialogue on the influence of money on politics as well as the outsized influence of AIPAC on Congress.




AIPAC spent almost $4 million on lobbying activities in 2018 and enjoys the support of a broad swathe of men and women in Congress. The impact of the Israel Lobby is also considerable.

According to the Guardian newspaper, pro-Israel lobbyists and donors spent more than $22 million on lobbying and campaign contributions during the 2018 election cycle.

“The same or similar Israel-aligned groups and donors have spent hundreds of millions of dollars in recent decades, and that money poured into American politics through a variety of channels,” according to the non-profit, non-partisan Center for Responsive Politics. The CRP uses federal election records to track campaign finance spending and makes its data available on the Open Secrets site.

President Donald Trump recently finalized an agreement to provide Israel with $38 billion in military aid over the next 10 years.

In 2004, academics John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt wrote a detailed article in the London Review of Books, titled, “The Israeli Lobby,” where they showed, “Other special-interest groups have managed to skew foreign policy, but no lobby has managed to divert it as far from what the national interest would suggest, while simultaneously convincing Americans that U.S. interests and those of the other country—in this case, Israel—are essentially identical.”

“Since the October War in 1973, Washington has provided Israel with a level of support dwarfing that given to any other state,” the authors said. “It has been the largest annual recipient of direct economic and military assistance since 1976 and is the largest recipient in total since World War Two, to the tune of well over $140 billion (in 2004 dollars). Israel receives about $3 billion in direct assistance each year, roughly one-fifth of the foreign aid budget, and worth about $500 a year for every Israeli. This largesse is especially striking since Israel is now a wealthy industrial state with a per capita income roughly equal to that of South Korea or Spain.

“It is the only recipient that does not have to account for how the aid is spent, which makes it virtually impossible to prevent the money from being used for purposes the U.S. opposes, such as building settlements on the West Bank,” the authors said. “Moreover, the U.S. has provided Israel with nearly $3 billion to develop weapons systems, and given it access to such top-drawer weaponry as Blackhawk helicopters and F-16 jets. Finally, the U.S. gives Israel access to intelligence it denies to its NATO allies and has turned a blind eye to Israel’s acquisition of nuclear weapons.”

What is often overlooked is the absolute devastation visited on the Palestinians by the Israeli Defense Force and other instruments of the government.

The Rev. Graylan Hagler visited in 1974, 2004 and 2006 with a delegation of clergy to “investigate what was going on in Israel and the Occupied Territories.” What he and Rev. Patti Fears saw, (she visited in 2017), challenged their accepted Christian narrative.

“What Israel is doing has nothing to do with and is not related to Jews in the Bible,” said Rev. Hagler. “What we saw was a European-American enterprise of colonialism. They have absolute control. We couldn’t get into Gaza, but we were able to get into the West Bank. Gaza is an open-air prison camp.”

“The new constitution renders Palestinians second, third and fourth-class citizens. Settlers can carry automatic weapons; the occupied West Bank is controlled by soldiers and Palestinians aren’t allowed to carry weapons.

“Israel has and continues to steal, appropriate or seize Palestinian land, resettle Israelis on that land and kill, maim or imprison anyone who resists.”

Israeli-American activist and writer Miko Peled said much of the anger towards Rep. Omar stems from fear and race.

“American political institutions are made up of White men who’re not used to Black women,” he told The Final Call during a telephone call from Palestine. “It’s racism. In their mind, she’s supposed to be subservient but she’s calling them out and calling out AIPAC. She has courage and is eloquent and they don’t know what to do with her.”

The Rev. Hagler and the Rev. Fears are among those who are pushing back against the hysteria surrounding Rep. Omar.

“She’s not wrong,” said Rev. Hagler, senior pastor of Plymouth Congressional Church in Northeast D.C. “The Anti-Defamation League, American Jewish Congress and others have used the power that they have to scare and intimidate people. The Zionist movement has blurred the line between Israel, Judaism and Jews. But the Jewish state is a racist, colonial, apartheid state. If you can’t criticize them, you couldn’t criticize apartheid in South Africa or Jim Crow in the U.S.

“They label any criticism of Israeli government policy as anti-Semitic and people start freaking out and not wanting to deal with it. This is not a special category of racism and their suffering is no greater than anybody else’s suffering. Their suffering is no less than the genocide of Native Americans or the Middle Passage.”

Rev. Fears, pastor of Fellowship Baptist Church in Northwest D.C. decried the cruelty she saw in Palestine and lamented not having answers.

“People are treated poorly, houses were bulldozed while people walked by laughing and there were guns to protect the Israelis,” she said. “There was just so much inhumane treatment. The moral characteristic we expected is misplaced. This is a land grab. Israel perpetuates violence and is using military force to eliminate people. They’re not relocating people, they’re killing people. Too many people have been hurt. There will be implosion. It really will take the rise of people to chance this. I wish I had the answer that there will be a real two-state system.”

Tuesday, March 5

From The Final Call Newspaper

An unraveling presidency?

By Askia Muhammad -Senior Editor

Contentious hearing of former Trump ‘fixer’ raises more questions, suspicions 


Michael Cohen, President Donald Trump's former personal lawyer, testifies before the House Oversight and Reform Committee on Capitol Hill, Feb. 27, in Washing- ton. Photo: AP Photo/Alex Brandon


WASHINGTON—During a riveting day of testimony before the House Oversight Committee, President Donald J. Trump’s longtime personal attorney and fixer said bluntly what many have suspected for years: “I am ashamed because I know what Mr. Trump is. He is a racist, he is a conman, and he is a cheat.”

Michael Cohen worked for Mr. Trump more than 10 years, during which time the president pressured him to lie; to make hush money payments; and to threaten contractors who were owed money by Mr. Trump, and to even threaten his former schools not to release his grades or test scores, he told Congress.


Donald Trump, United States President Photo: MGN Online


“Never in a million years did I imagine, when I accepted a job in 2007 to work for Donald Trump, that he would one day run for President, launch a campaign on a platform of hate and intolerance, and actually win. I regret the day I said ‘yes’ to Mr. Trump. I regret all the help and support I gave him along the way,” Mr. Cohen said during his Feb. 27 testimony.

“I am ashamed of my weakness and misplaced loyalty—of the things I did for Mr. Trump in an effort to protect and promote him. I am ashamed that I chose to take part in concealing Mr. Trump’s illicit acts rather than listening to my own conscience.”

What’s worse is that it could get worse. “After you’ve heard Michael Cohen describe Donald Trump and literally say the stuff you’ve heard about Donald Trump being a racist is nothing compared to what he really is: like he’s worse,” John Nichols, national affairs correspondent for The Nation told this writer. “And that’s essentially what Michael Cohen was saying today.

“I think we really today could go back in the future and say, this is the day where you started to see some major unraveling of the Trump administration. You’ve got to have those next stages. But if you do, I think you’ll trace back to this testimony, and you’ll say: ‘This Michael Cohen, he came up there and he basically laid some things out.’ Remember once upon a time, a long time ago, people didn’t think John Dean was that big a deal or that good a guy. History makes you better,” Mr. Nichols said.

Despite the similarities observers draw between Mr. Dean’s impact on the presidency of Richard Nixon, who resigned after Mr. Dean’s testimony in 1974 rather than face impeachment, and Mr. Cohen’s damage to Mr. Trump, this president is unlikely to resign, and if impeached by the House, very unlikely to be convicted and removed by a two-thirds vote in the Senate.

“But I think the public deserves the truth,” David Corn, Washington Bureau Chief for Mother Jones told this writer. “Yesterday, Mark Warner, the ranking Democrat on the Senate Intelligence Committee, after he heard testimony with Michael Cohen that was private and about more of the Russia stuff that we’re seeing today came out and said: ‘In all my years as a senator, I’ve never been in a more consequential meeting.’ And basically said, ‘I’m scared by what I heard.’ Well, we need to know, the public needs to know what the heck Warner is talking about.”

“I got to know him very well, working very closely with him for more than 10 years, as his Executive Vice President and Special Counsel and then personal attorney when he became President,” Mr. Cohen testified. “I wound up touting the Trump narrative for over a decade. That was my job. Always stay on message. Always defend. It monopolized my life. Over time, I saw his true character revealed.

“Mr. Trump is an enigma. He is complicated, as am I. He has both good and bad, as do we all. But the bad far outweighs the good, and since taking office, he has become the worst version of himself.

“Donald Trump is a man who ran for office to make his brand great, not to make our country great. He had no desire or intention to lead this nation, only to market himself and to build his wealth and power. Mr. Trump would often say, this campaign was going to be the ‘greatest infomercial in political history.’

“He never expected to win the primary. He never expected to win the general election. The campaign – for him – was always a marketing opportunity,” Mr. Cohen said.



A protester holds a sign after the hearing of President Donald Trump's former lawyer Michael Cohen, before the House Oversight and Reform Committee, on Capitol Hill, Feb. 27, in Washington. Photo: AP Photo/Jose Luis Magana


What was equally revealing about the hearing was the Republican strategy. All 17 GOP committee members simply challenged Mr. Cohen’s credibility rather than defend Mr. Trump on his merits.

“I think what the Republicans are doing is that they are giving their base reasons to shut their ear,” Bill Fletcher, a senior scholar with the Institute for Policy Studies, said in an interview. “They know that anyone that’s objective minded, is as we saw in the Watergate hearings, going to be listening and trying to evaluate what’s really happening here. In this case, the aim of the Republicans is to make sure that their base doesn’t lose hope and that their base doesn’t unravel.

“You see, the thing about Trump’s base, which is very much like the case with Hitler’s base and the base of many other, autocrats and demagogues is that they believe it’s like the closing line in the monologue that comedian George Wallace would say: ‘That’s the way I see it, and that’s the way it ought to be.’ And there’s a lot of ways that should be the slogan of the Republican Party because they are not interested in anything factual,” Mr. Fletcher continued.

Republicans are reluctant to condemn Mr. Trump “because of the blind loyalty or their own ambition. So we can just look forward to more of the same blind loyalty to their ambition and political agenda. I like to refer to Trump as a blunt force object that the Republican Party has used in order to advance their agenda. And whether they happen to like him or not; respect him or not; they, they look at him as a useful tool in order to advance their, their objective,” said Mr. Fletcher.

“It’s amazing to me,” said Mr. Corn. “I keep saying and I sound naive, but it still is amazing to me that Republicans put up with us because they just don’t seem to care. They get their tax cuts. They get their conservative Supreme Court justices and federal judges don’t forget them, and they just don’t give a damn that they have a president who’s making a mockery of American values, who’s violating the Constitution. And who is even, as Michael Cohen said today, destroying civility and public discourse and ruining norms of government that have existed for decades.

“So every week we hit rock bottom, I always say yes, then the next week comes along.”

During the hearing, after Mr. Cohen called Mr. Trump a racist in his opening remarks, Rep. Mark Meadows (R-N.C.), introduced Lynne Patton, a former event planner who worked for the Trump family and is now a top official in the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development. Democrats complained loudly. Ms. Patton is Black and touted as proof Mr. Trump was not racist.

“Having endured the public comments of racism of the sitting president, as a Black person, I can only imagine what’s being said in private,” Rep. Brenda Lawrence (D-Mich.) said. “To prop up one member of our entire race and say that nullifies it is totally insulting. To look at his administration speaks volumes.”

Rep. Meadows quoted Ms. Patton as saying she would never work for someone who was a racist. Mr. Cohen responded that as the son of a Holocaust survivor, he should not have done so either but he did. “Ask Miss Patton how many people who are Black are executives at the Trump organization,” Mr. Cohen said. “And the answer is zero.”

Mr. Trump has been accused of making insensitive remarks toward Black people in the past. Also none of his top White House staff are Black and only one member of his Cabinet—Housing and Urban Development Secretary Ben Carson—is Black.

During his testimony, Mr. Cohen said Mr. Trump has courted the favor of White supremacists and bigots and that, during one drive-through of a poor neighborhood in Chicago, Mr. Trump “commented that only Black people could live that way.” He also said that Mr. Trump once told him that “Black people would never vote for him because they were too stupid.”

“He considers Black people to be stupid,” Dr. Gerald Horne, Moore Professor of History and African Studies at the University of Houston said in an interview. “That this was not necessarily a revelation to those who pay close attention, but however, I think it should remind us that there is an active lobby, an active electorate in this country, which is determined to push the clock back.

“He’s pushing the clock in a counter revolutionary direction towards an era of unrivaled White supremacy, unrivaled messaging and all the rest,” said Dr. Horne. “We need to step up our activism. We need to particularly step up our activism in the international arena.

“We’re going to fall victim to the 63 billion block of voters who saw Mr. Trump and said they would not turn against him even if he killed somebody in the middle of Fifth Avenue, and I think we should take that particular comment very seriously. It would not surprise me in the least if Mr. Trump’s base would not crumble and desert him despite this damaging and devastating testimony, despite the fact that if true, he has been painted as a con man and a fraud and a racist to boot, and so if they’re not going to desert him, obviously we need a new approach.”

Bill Fletcher agrees. “I mean, a strategy that is hoping to win over Trump’s base is a strategy that will fail. It is a segment of the population that is an effect dying out, that is resisting every moment that they can. And unfortunately the truth gets in the way of their view. So we shouldn’t worry about trying to convince them. We have to, we have to strengthen our side and we have to win those who are vacillating to understand the ramifications of siding with the likes of Trump.

“I mean every week I say we hit rock bottom and I said that every week. So I mean, I think the amount of, of inappropriate, improper perhaps, illegal activity in this administration continues to go on. It went on for two years unabated because Congress did not step in and start looking at any of this stuff. Now we have a Congress, at least the House that is willing to do something and we’ll see how far they get and how much resistance there is from the Trump administration or other federal agencies when they start asking for information. You know, with Trump, I mean every day, I think people scratch their head and say, how much lower can it go?”

Author David K. Johnston says the corruption goes back decades. “Well, you know, I’ve covered Donald longer than anybody else, more than 30 years,” Mr. Johnston told this writer in an interview. “And my personal and emotional response when I read his 20 page statements to Congress today was, that’s everything I’ve been trying to get people to understand about Donald from day one. He’s a White collar, head of a crime family.”

Ruth Coniff, Editor-at-Large at The Progressive magazine agrees. “It seems like the Trump family is really, it’s like a Mafia basement and (Mr. Cohen) was, you know, he was working for the mobster. Ms. Coniff said in an interview.

What’s worse, Mr. Cohen suggested that President Trump might stage a coup, or manufacture a national emergency to seize power in case he’s not reelected. “Given my experience working for Mr. Trump, I fear that if he loses the election in 2020 that there will not be a peaceful transition of power,” Mr. Cohen said.

“You have to remember even after Nazi Germany was defeated after fascist Italy was defeated, there remained the core of Nazis, a core of fascists that could simply not be convinced that the path that had been taken was the incorrect path,” Mr. Fletcher warned.

“One of my takeaways from these riveting hearings today is that we are in the midst of a counter revolution,” said Dr. Horne.

Mr. Trump’s own response was to blame Mr. Cohen and the Congressional hearing for his failure to secure an agreement with North Korean leader Kim Jong Un at a highly anticipated summit in Vietnam. Mr. Trump said on March 4 that the Democrats’ decision to interview his longtime fixer and lawyer, on the same day as his own meeting with Mr. Kim, may have contributed to the North Korea summit ending with no deal.

The two leaders met for the second time in Hanoi to try to negotiate a denuclearization deal as Mr. Cohen was testifying, accusing Mr. Trump of ordering him to make threats for him about 500 times over the last 10 years.

“For the Democrats to interview in open hearings a convicted liar & fraudster, at the same time as the very important Nuclear Summit with North Korea, is perhaps a new low in American politics and may have contributed to the ‘walk’,” Mr. Trump said on Twitter, referring to his decision to walk away from what he previously said was a bad deal with Mr. Kim.